AGAINST PUNISHMENT
We hope to keep the very concept of punishment alien to our children. --Irving Fiske, 1950s.
This is the core-premise of Quarry Hill.
It is to us
as self-evident as it was to Thomas Jefferson that "all men are
created equal."
All children
are created aware, awake, filled with enthusiasm and joy-- and so immensely
open that our actions toward them can help each to fulfill and retain her
or his original delight. For while it may be true, as William Blake says, that
the "soul of sweet delight can never be defil'd,"
it can be attacked, stunned, disenchanted, driven underground in a person's psyche, and at the worst, it can be hidden behind impenetrable curtains of hatred, sadism or masochism, and rage. Blake again: "The child that weeps the Rod Beneath writes Revenge in realms of Death."
It does not
even have to be corporal punishment, though my parents thought, and we tried to
act in the awareness that it was the very worst thing one can do to a child.
While verbal insults, the calling of names, and the deprivation of freedom can
be horrible too, nothing matches the trauma and shock of having pain inflicted
on one's small body by a much larger person. Not only the pain but the loss of
control over one's own inner dignity and wholeness, the humiliation, and so
many other things-- but the worst is the pain, burning into a child that they
are at the mercy of an insane giant, as Irving put it.
However,
even depriving a kid of freedom or ordering her or him to spend time alone in a
bedroom is a horrible thing to do. It makes the room seem a place of
imprisonment, not a cozy place to rest. It makes the child feel an outcast when
the best thing to do is to let the child have its own inner freedom. There are
other ways of handling difficult behaviors than punishment.
It
diminishes a child’s joy and inner liberty. to demonstrate one’s power over
them. It diminishes his or her sense of
self and freedom. The person who did this ought to know better, having spent
time at QH when a child.
With a small
child, we can offer a distraction from any activity we would prefer they not
engage in. With a slightly older child, we may say "We can't do
that," and explain why. We can stand our ground that it can't happen that
way. But we should not punish the child.
They will only remember that they were
deprived of something, and be angry and hurt-- and often turn this anger and
hurt in upon themselves.
I am holding
parents and caregivers to a VERY high standard, and I believe we all must do
so, hold ourselves to a high standard. And of course, I was not, as a parent,
always perfect.
But I knew
it was wrong-- I never used punishment, and I always apologized for any action
of mine that was harsh or unpleasant. My husband and I did not always manage to
control our annoyance with one another around the children and we did yell at
one another sometimes in their presence. But I did not try to tell the
kids that I was right and they were wrong... I told them it was a big mistake
on my part when I was not as kind as I ought to be.
Why not try
it? Humanity has tried so many things, but except in small pockets, it has
never tried absolute openness to kids, utter acceptance, and the refusal to
tell them they are bad (they aren't,) to to punish them. What right do we have
to do that anyway? Who died and made us God?
If we knew
that we already come here as God, or the Life Force, or the core of all things,
the Light Within, we might not be so hasty to take out our nastiness on our
kids.
Of course,
we have to keep them from hurting one another, or being too unkind, or
destroying things, or harming animals. But teaching them patiently why these
things are not good is so much better than a blind angry attack on them in the
assumption that they are WRONG in some way.
I was a very
jealous sister. I hated my younger brother (I was 3 1/2 when he was born, and
there had been a lot of upheaval in the family beforehand), and I tried to hurt
him, told him I hated him and so on. Now, of course, I wish I hadn't. But I
think my mother, my parents, could have found better ways to keep the tensions
from becoming so intense between us. For one thing, neither of us knew many
other kids. We were always traveling. If we had been able to each have more
companions of our own age, and had not been thrown together so much, I think we
would have been less involved with one another and less inclined to attack (my
brother once dug a pit with sharp stakes at the bottom and leaves over the top
for me to fall into).
We can do
better, and we must. Give up the traditional weaponry of parenthood, and open
the gate to a more loving and peaceful life--even if at times it isn't as
simple a solution as punishment, which after all ends up far less simple in the
long run.
Phoro--BRANDON KITCHEN of his twins, Castiel and Christian.
Phoro--BRANDON KITCHEN of his twins, Castiel and Christian.
No comments:
Post a Comment